“Those sorts of issues should never have been something for an official government regulator to be wasting taxpayers’ money. As of Tuesday, those offences are gone altogether.”
In a statement, he later described the watchdog as “a politicised and discredited organisation established by the previous government to target workers purely for ideological reasons”.
The commission’s spokesperson said “the regulatory framework under which the building and construction industry operates is ultimately a matter for government. The [commission] does not make the laws, it enforces the laws and will continue to do so in accordance with its statutory remit”.
“We would welcome advice from the minister on the government’s intentions in relation to the Building Code so that we can advise industry,” the spokesperson said, adding it was important the commission was able to keep providing advice under the code until the law that created the watchdog was repealed.
Labor went to the election promising to abolish the watchdog. Burke confirmed on Sunday that the government would do so this year. However, as a statutory body, its removal must be legislated, and Labor does not have a majority in the Senate to guarantee this. Even with the support of the Greens, it is likely to need the vote of a crossbench senator. ACT senator David Pocock recently raised concerns about the abolition of the commission. Other crossbenchers are yet to decide their position.
Loading
Burke said the commission’s record, mostly involving cases against the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union “proves it has been more concerned with pursuing and punishing workers than tackling rampant wage theft and compromised safety standards”.
Opposition industrial relations spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said, “this proves once again that Labor will always capitulate to their paymasters at the CFMMEU”.
Jon Davies, head of the Australian Constructors Association, which represents construction companies, acknowledged all employers, employees and unions should be treated alike.
“While the construction industry currently has additional oversight, it is important that the pendulum not swing too far towards an unregulated environment that fails to recognise the unique and, at times, troubled history of the sector,” he said.
Last month the Federal Court delivered record fines of $840,000 against the CFMMEU and its officials after the building commission prosecuted the union for coercive behaviour across multiple Brisbane building projects, which the court said had the potential to create economic loss.
Loading
In April, the High Court backed maximum fines issued to the union for lesser offences, saying its repeated rule-breaking demonstrated it regarded lesser penalties as the “cost of doing business”.
The union’s construction division secretary, Dave Noonan, said the code prevented unions and employers from freely bargaining on apprentice ratios, quotas on employing Indigenous Australians, and enforceable gender equality measures, as well as banning workers from wearing union logo stickers on their hard hats.
“Even printed safety advice such as COVID information was banned by the draconian code, simply because the logos of the union and employer groups were on the document,” Noonan said.
Electrical Trades Union national secretary Michael Wright echoed Noonan’s sentiments, adding the winding back of the code also meant the deletion of provisions that gave employers free rein over using labour-hire arrangements for less money.
Burke said the 39 outstanding prosecutions would be transferred to the remit of the Fair Work Ombudsman, which would enforce the rules of the Fair Work Act over the building and construction industry. He said improving the safety culture of the industry would be overseen by the Federal Safety Commissioner.
An interim code would take effect from Tuesday, cut red tape and only include the elements necessary to keep the industry in check.
Master Builders Australia head Denita Wawn welcomed the transfer of outstanding cases to the ombudsman but said abolishing the construction watchdog would have “substantial negative flow-on effects”.
Critics of the watchdog “cannot simply ignore the continuous succession of Federal Court judgments documenting this reality,” Wawn said.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.